Fiche retenue BnF, complétée par Open Library
- Titre BnF
- Shakespeare and literary theory
- Auteurs BnF
- Jonathan Gil Harris
- Collection BnF
- Oxford Shakespeare topics
- Éditeur BnF
- Oxford university press
- Date de publication BnF
- 2010
- Pages BnF
- 224
- Format BnF
- relié, 21 cm
- Support BnF
- papier
- Langue BnF
- en
- Résumé Open Library
- How is it that the British literary critic Terry Eagleton can say that "it is difficult to read Shakespeare without feeling that he was almost certainly familiar with the writings of Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Wittgenstein, and Derrida?" Shakespeare and Literary Theory argues that literary theory is less an external set of ideas anachronistically imposed on Shakespeare's texts than a mode--or several modes--of critical reflection inspired by, and emerging from, his writing. To name just a few examples: Karl Marx used Timon of Athens to illustrate aspects of his economic theory; psychoanalytic theorists from Sigmund Freud to Jacques Lacan have explained some of their most axiomatic positions with reference to Hamlet; Jacques Derrida's deconstructive philosophy is articulated in dialogue with Shakespeare's plays; French feminism's best-known essay is Hélène Cixous's meditation on Antony and Cleopatra; and postcolonial theory owes a large debt to Aimé Césaire's revision of The Tempest. By reading what theoretical movements have had to say about and in concert with Shakespeare, we can begin to get a sense of how much the DNA of contemporary literary theory contains a startling abundance of chromosomes that are of Shakespearian provenance.
- Catégories / sujets BnF
- Littérature anglaise -- 16e siècle -- Théorie littéraire · Littérature anglaise -- 17e siècle -- Théorie littéraire · Shakespeare -- William -- Critique et interprétation
BnF trouvé
201 ms (en cache)
- Titre
- Shakespeare and literary theory
- Sous-titre
- —
- Titre original
- —
- Langue originale
- —
- Auteurs
- Jonathan Gil Harris
- Traduction
- —
- Illustration
- —
- Série
- —
- Tome
- —
- Collection
- Oxford Shakespeare topics
- Éditeur
- Oxford university press
- Date de publication
- 2010
- Pages
- 224
- Format
- relié, 21 cm
- Prix éditeur
- —
- Support
- papier
- Langue
- en
- Résumé
- —
- Catégories / sujets
- Littérature anglaise -- 16e siècle -- Théorie littéraire · Littérature anglaise -- 17e siècle -- Théorie littéraire · Shakespeare -- William -- Critique et interprétation
JSON brut
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><srw:searchRetrieveResponse xmlns:srw="http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/" xmlns="http://catalogue.bnf.fr/namespaces/InterXMarc" xmlns:ixm="http://catalogue.bnf.fr/namespaces/InterXMarc" xmlns:mn="http://catalogue.bnf.fr/namespaces/motsnotices" xmlns:sd="http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/diagnostic/"> <srw:version>1.2</srw:version> <srw:echoedSearchRetrieveRequest> <srw:version>1.2</srw:version> <srw:query>bib.isbn adj "9780199573394" or bib.isbn adj "0199573395"</srw:query> </srw:echoedSearchRetrieveRequest> <srw:numberOfRecords>1</srw:numberOfRecords> <srw:records> <srw:record> <srw:recordSchema>marcxchange</srw:recordSchema> <srw:recordPacking>xml</srw:recordPacking> <srw:recordData> <mxc:record xmlns:mxc="info:lc/xmlns/marcxchange-v2" format="UNIMARC" id="ark:/12148/cb422594608" type="Bibliographic"> <mxc:leader> cam 22 3 450 </mxc:leader> <mxc:controlfield tag="001">FRBNF422594600000002</mxc:controlfield> <mxc:controlfield tag="003">http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb422594608</mxc:controlfield> <mxc:datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="a">978-0-19-957339-4</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="b">rel.</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="a">20100820d2010 m y0frey50 ba</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="101" ind1="0" ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="a">eng</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="102" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="a">GB</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="105" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="a">||||z 00|||</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="106" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="a">r</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="181" ind1=" " ind2="0"> <mxc:subfield code="6">01</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="a">i </mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="b">xxxe </mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="181" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="6">02</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="c">txt</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="2">rdacontent</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="182" ind1=" " ind2="0"> <mxc:subfield code="6">01</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="a">n</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="182" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="6">02</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="c">n</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="2">rdamedia</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="200" ind1="1" ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="a">Shakespeare and literary theory</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="b">Texte imprimé</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="f">Jonathan Gil Harris</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="210" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="a">Oxford (GB)</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="c">Oxford university press</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="d">2010</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="215" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="a">1 vol. (VIII-224 p.)</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="d">21 cm</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="225" ind1="|" ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="a">Oxford Shakespeare topics</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="a">Notes bibliogr. Index</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="410" ind1=" " ind2="0"> <mxc:subfield code="0">38903212</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="t">Oxford Shakespeare topics</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="d">2010</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="600" ind1=" " ind2="|"> <mxc:subfield code="3">11924607</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="a">Shakespeare</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="b">William</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="f">1564-1616</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="3">12042895</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="x">Critique et interprétation</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="2">rameau</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="3">12078078</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="a">Littérature anglaise</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="z">16e siècle</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="3">11932255</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="x">Théorie littéraire</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="2">rameau</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="606" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="3">12078079</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="a">Littérature anglaise</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="z">17e siècle</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="3">11932255</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="x">Théorie littéraire</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="2">rameau</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="676" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="a">822.33 (critique)</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="v">23</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2="|"> <mxc:subfield code="3">13745798</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="o">ISNI0000000033545112</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="a">Harris</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="b">Jonathan Gil</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="4">070</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="801" ind1=" " ind2="0"> <mxc:subfield code="a">FR</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="b">FR-751131015</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="c">20100820</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="g">AFNOR</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="h">FRBNF422594600000002</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="2">intermrc</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> <mxc:datafield tag="930" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <mxc:subfield code="5">FR-751131010:42259460001001</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="a">82/31 SHAK 5 HA</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="b">759999999</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="c">Tolbiac - Haut de Jardin - Littérature et art - Salle G - Libre accès</mxc:subfield> <mxc:subfield code="d">N</mxc:subfield> </mxc:datafield> </mxc:record> </srw:recordData> <srw:recordIdentifier>ark:/12148/cb422594608</srw:recordIdentifier> <srw:recordPosition>1</srw:recordPosition> <srw:extraRecordData> <ixm:attr name="CreationDate">20100820</ixm:attr> <ixm:attr name="LastModificationDate">20110120</ixm:attr> <mn:score>6.445863</mn:score> </srw:extraRecordData> </srw:record> </srw:records> </srw:searchRetrieveResponse>
Open Library trouvé
1024 ms (en cache)
- Titre
- Shakespeare And Literary Theory
- Sous-titre
- —
- Titre original
- —
- Langue originale
- —
- Auteurs
- Jonathan Gil Harris
- Traduction
- —
- Illustration
- —
- Série
- —
- Tome
- —
- Collection
- —
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press
- Date de publication
- 2010
- Pages
- 224
- Format
- —
- Prix éditeur
- —
- Support
- —
- Langue
- en
- Résumé
- How is it that the British literary critic Terry Eagleton can say that "it is difficult to read Shakespeare without feeling that he was almost certainly familiar with the writings of Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Wittgenstein, and Derrida?" Shakespeare and Literary Theory argues that literary theory is less an external set of ideas anachronistically imposed on Shakespeare's texts than a mode--or several modes--of critical reflection inspired by, and emerging from, his writing. To name just a few examples: Karl Marx used Timon of Athens to illustrate aspects of his economic theory; psychoanalytic theorists from Sigmund Freud to Jacques Lacan have explained some of their most axiomatic positions with reference to Hamlet; Jacques Derrida's deconstructive philosophy is articulated in dialogue with Shakespeare's plays; French feminism's best-known essay is Hélène Cixous's meditation on Antony and Cleopatra; and postcolonial theory owes a large debt to Aimé Césaire's revision of The Tempest. By reading what theoretical movements have had to say about and in concert with Shakespeare, we can begin to get a sense of how much the DNA of contemporary literary theory contains a startling abundance of chromosomes that are of Shakespearian provenance.
- Catégories / sujets
- Criticism and interpretation · Shakespeare, william, 1564-1616, criticism and interpretation · English literature · History and criticism · Theory · LITERARY CRITICISM · Shakespeare · DRAMA
JSON brut
{
"work": {
"key": "/works/OL17384340W",
"type": {
"key": "/type/work"
},
"title": "Shakespeare And Literary Theory",
"covers": [
7471595
],
"genres": [
"/tags/OL167T"
],
"authors": [
{
"type": {
"key": "/type/author_role"
},
"author": {
"key": "/authors/OL393691A"
}
}
],
"created": {
"type": "/type/datetime",
"value": "2016-10-14T02:07:52.266890"
},
"revision": 8,
"subjects": [
"Criticism and interpretation",
"Shakespeare, william, 1564-1616, criticism and interpretation",
"English literature",
"History and criticism",
"Theory",
"LITERARY CRITICISM",
"Shakespeare",
"DRAMA"
],
"description": {
"type": "/type/text",
"value": "How is it that the British literary critic Terry Eagleton can say that \"it is difficult to read Shakespeare without feeling that he was almost certainly familiar with the writings of Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Wittgenstein, and Derrida?\" Shakespeare and Literary Theory argues that literary theory is less an external set of ideas anachronistically imposed on Shakespeare's texts than a mode--or several modes--of critical reflection inspired by, and emerging from, his writing. To name just a few examples: Karl Marx used Timon of Athens to illustrate aspects of his economic theory; psychoanalytic theorists from Sigmund Freud to Jacques Lacan have explained some of their most axiomatic positions with reference to Hamlet; Jacques Derrida's deconstructive philosophy is articulated in dialogue with Shakespeare's plays; French feminism's best-known essay is Hélène Cixous's meditation on Antony and Cleopatra; and postcolonial theory owes a large debt to Aimé Césaire's revision of The Tempest. By reading what theoretical movements have had to say about and in concert with Shakespeare, we can begin to get a sense of how much the DNA of contemporary literary theory contains a startling abundance of chromosomes that are of Shakespearian provenance."
},
"last_modified": {
"type": "/type/datetime",
"value": "2026-08-29T05:37:43.460973"
},
"latest_revision": 8
},
"edition": {
"key": "/books/OL25964093M",
"lccn": [
"2010283182"
],
"type": {
"key": "/type/edition"
},
"title": "Shakespeare And Literary Theory",
"works": [
{
"key": "/works/OL17384340W"
}
],
"covers": [
7471583
],
"created": {
"type": "/type/datetime",
"value": "2016-10-14T02:07:52.266890"
},
"isbn_13": [
"9780199573394"
],
"revision": 12,
"languages": [
{
"key": "/languages/eng"
}
],
"publishers": [
"Oxford University Press"
],
"description": {
"type": "/type/text",
"value": "How is it that the British literary critic Terry Eagleton can say that \"it is difficult to read Shakespeare without feeling that he was almost certainly familiar with the writings of Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Wittgenstein, and Derrida?\" Shakespeare and Literary Theory argues that literary theory is less an external set of ideas anachronistically imposed on Shakespeare's texts than a mode--or several modes--of critical reflection inspired by, and emerging from, his writing. To name just a few examples: Karl Marx used Timon of Athens to illustrate aspects of his economic theory; psychoanalytic theorists from Sigmund Freud to Jacques Lacan have explained some of their most axiomatic positions with reference to Hamlet; Jacques Derrida's deconstructive philosophy is articulated in dialogue with Shakespeare's plays; French feminism's best-known essay is Hélène Cixous's meditation on Antony and Cleopatra; and postcolonial theory owes a large debt to Aimé Césaire's revision of The Tempest. By reading what theoretical movements have had to say about and in concert with Shakespeare, we can begin to get a sense of how much the DNA of contemporary literary theory contains a startling abundance of chromosomes that are of Shakespearian provenance."
},
"identifiers": {},
"oclc_numbers": [
"500794399"
],
"publish_date": "2010",
"last_modified": {
"type": "/type/datetime",
"value": "2025-04-22T23:22:35.302024"
},
"source_records": [
"ia:shakespeareliter00harr",
"bwb:9780199573394",
"marc:marc_loc_2016/BooksAll.2016.part37.utf8:187537059:1122",
"ia:shakespeareliter0000harr",
"marc:marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-018.mrc:52298207:1048",
"marc:harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.12.20150123.full.mrc:441647093:2088",
"amazon:0199573395",
"marc:harvard_bibliographic_metadata/20220215_001.bib.mrc:335654084:4205"
],
"latest_revision": 12,
"number_of_pages": 224,
"lc_classifications": [
"PR2976",
"PR2965 .H37 2010",
"PR2965 .H37 2010eb",
"PR2976 .H37 2010"
]
},
"api_books": {
"ISBN:9780199573394": {
"key": "/books/OL25964093M",
"url": "http://openlibrary.org/books/OL25964093M/Shakespeare_And_Literary_Theory",
"cover": {
"large": "https://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/7471583-L.jpg",
"small": "https://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/7471583-S.jpg",
"medium": "https://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/7471583-M.jpg"
},
"title": "Shakespeare And Literary Theory",
"authors": [
{
"url": "http://openlibrary.org/authors/OL393691A/Jonathan_Gil_Harris",
"name": "Jonathan Gil Harris"
}
],
"subjects": [
{
"url": "https://openlibrary.org/subjects/criticism_and_interpretation",
"name": "Criticism and interpretation"
},
{
"url": "https://openlibrary.org/subjects/shakespeare,_william,_1564-1616,_criticism_and_interpretation",
"name": "Shakespeare, william, 1564-1616, criticism and interpretation"
},
{
"url": "https://openlibrary.org/subjects/english_literature",
"name": "English literature"
},
{
"url": "https://openlibrary.org/subjects/history_and_criticism",
"name": "History and criticism"
},
{
"url": "https://openlibrary.org/subjects/theory",
"name": "Theory"
},
{
"url": "https://openlibrary.org/subjects/literary_criticism",
"name": "LITERARY CRITICISM"
},
{
"url": "https://openlibrary.org/subjects/shakespeare",
"name": "Shakespeare"
},
{
"url": "https://openlibrary.org/subjects/drama",
"name": "DRAMA"
}
],
"publishers": [
{
"name": "Oxford University Press"
}
],
"identifiers": {
"lccn": [
"2010283182"
],
"oclc": [
"500794399"
],
"isbn_13": [
"9780199573394"
],
"openlibrary": [
"OL25964093M"
]
},
"publish_date": "2010",
"classifications": {
"lc_classifications": [
"PR2976",
"PR2965 .H37 2010",
"PR2965 .H37 2010eb",
"PR2976 .H37 2010"
]
},
"number_of_pages": 224
}
}
}| Champ | BnF | Open Library |
|---|---|---|
| Titre | ✔ | ✔ |
| Sous-titre | ✘ | ✘ |
| Titre original | ✘ | ✘ |
| Langue originale | ✘ | ✘ |
| Auteurs | ✔ | ✔ |
| Traduction | ✘ | ✘ |
| Illustration | ✘ | ✘ |
| Série | ✘ | ✘ |
| Tome | ✘ | ✘ |
| Collection | ✔ | ✘ |
| Éditeur | ✔ | ✔ |
| Date de publication | ✔ | ✔ |
| Pages | ✔ | ✔ |
| Format | ✔ | ✘ |
| Prix éditeur | ✘ | ✘ |
| Support | ✔ | ✘ |
| Langue | ✔ | ✔ |
| Résumé | ✘ | ✔ |
| Couverture | ✘ | ✔ |
| Catégories / sujets | ✔ | ✔ |
⚠= valeurs divergentes entre sources (comparaison après normalisation : casse, accents, ordre des noms, année seule pour les dates).